“I always felt different growing up”

Durham Constabulary Inspector Adam Norris reflects on how his neurodivergent identity has shaped his career in policing

When arguing that policing should not just merely include neurodivergent officers – but actively draw upon their strengths – Durham Police Federation branch member Adam Norris can point towards his own career as clear evidence of the advantages.

And to help mark World Autism Awareness Day, this is exactly what he has done, discussing his experiences to help spread a message of acceptance and empowerment among his colleagues in Durham Constabulary.

In a life lived with autism and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Adam says his decision to join the Force at the age of 22 felt momentous – but it came long before he fully understood what neurodivergence actually was.

Instead, he simply knew something was different about the way his mind worked, without being able to put a definitive finger on what it might be.

“I always felt different growing up, like I was a bit of an outsider. That continued into much of my adult life, for years to come after I first became a PCSO and later a PC,” Adam said.

“I had an understanding of my traits and tendencies, such as hyperfocus, pattern recognition and sensitivity to justice – a big factor in why I wanted to go into policing in the first place – but beyond that, I didn’t know what I was living with.”

While this perspective on himself has changed in recent times, Adam revealed that for a portion of his policing service, he has been faced with difficult moments stemming from misunderstandings, the frustrations of others and even discrimination.

Equally, though, he hasn’t let this adversity stop him from achieving in the police and becoming a champion for diversity and equality in the process.

Across periods spent in response, custody, offender management and the control room, he has remained geared towards efficiency, which has been behind some of his proudest accomplishments in the Force.

“That’s another key trait of mine which has always been there,” added Adam, who currently works across both a response investigation team and a prisoner handling team.

“I’ve always been known as a proactive officer, trying to find ways to make our output quicker and more effective. Back when I was a sergeant involved in a shoplifting project, I had the idea of asking the tech company we were working with to develop a remote statement taker, meaning officers could get a statement with a digital signature from anywhere in the world.

“As a Force, it’s quite possible that Durham was the first in the country to use this technology, and we’ve used it to get statements from victims and witnesses from as far away as Australia and Singapore.

“Under my leadership as a response Inspector, my team was recognised for our work disrupting organised crime groups. In that one, I think I was helped and motivated by my intolerance for unfairness and deep need to seek justice.”

Thanks to strong levels of empathy, Adam has ensured the impact of his innovative policing style does not end with his colleagues.

The 42-year-old has also been responsible for the creation of a still-active scrutiny panel within Durham Constabulary’s custody suite, which aims to ensure proportionate uses of force are applied across detainees of all social groups.

Recently, he has zoomed into the care of neurodivergent detainees by acting as a tactical advisor to a working group focused on the treatment of such individuals during their time in custody – mainly by ensuring officers are upskilled with the cultural competence to recognise where this may be necessary.

“Having an awareness is what it all comes down to, really. I didn’t completely have that myself until my own diagnosis in 2024, which validated me as a person and made everything make sense, going back to when I was a child.

“Even before that, however, I was at least considerate of it, which wasn’t always been afforded to me in return at work. It is said that neurodivergent people will average roughly 20,000 more negative interactions than neurotypical people before they even reach adulthood, and in my experience, that certainly wasn’t the end point.

“We can be sensitive to rejection and appear rude when we may just be hyperfocused.”

Additionally, Adam says he has, on occasion, been put under limits, doubted and questioned over his suitability for a role or task.

And if this is happening to other officers in his position, he says this is what pains him the most, because it means his profession misses out on the full talents of its workforce.

“Reasonable adjustments should be advocated, but I think the ultimate aim should be to improve workplace environments so fewer reasonable adjustments need to exist – and this doesn’t just go for policing.

“For me, part of that is not just accommodating us, but taking advantage of our unique strengths and capabilities.

“Despite my struggles, I’ve still been lucky enough to have had those opportunities at times, but it’s not the same for everyone.

“If you feel like this is you, you should just be yourself and not ‘mask’ to appease others – the more people who are openly neurodivergent in the police service, the more we can normalise what is essentially a natural variation in how the mind works and remove the stigma.” ∎

This blog was originally published on the Durham Police Federation website – it is reproduced here with kind permission of the author

Neurodivergence and child‑to‑parent violence

by Sarah Whitehead
Neurodiversity Lead | Northamptonshire Police

As part of Neurodiversity Celebration Week, I would like to focus on and draw attention to the taboo subject of child-to-parent violence and abuse (CPVA) and the link to neurodivergent dysregulation.

CPVA encompasses a broad range of behaviours displayed by young people under the age of 18 years old towards their parents and/or caregivers. This behaviour may continue into adulthood.

It is important to distinguish between behaviours that are a direct result of the nervous system overload and that of intentional violence and coercive control.

The invisible load of parenting a neurodivergent child is real and can be extremely stressful. Neurodiversity rarely exists in isolation, and consequently many employees up and down the country are doing their best to navigate employment whilst managing inadequate school systems, healthcare pathways and being advocates for children and/or relatives, often alongside their own neurodivergent profiles; and with little to no external support.

The ‘family load’ fluctuates. Some weeks it is manageable; other weeks it is overwhelming. Traditional workplace models struggle with this reality, particularly when children are older and ‘should be trusted to be able to stay home alone by now’. Negative stereotypes are not at all helpful. Being called into school or to home at the last minute, or attending appointments that have taken two years to arrive is commonplace when parenting neurodivergent children. It is both overwhelming and exhausting, yet the world still turns, and the bills still need paying. Advocacy does not stop when a child turns 18 years old.

Neurodivergent children show a higher prevalence of CPVA, and often conflict arises where adults struggle to distinguish whether violent episodes are directly related to a nervous system overload, mental health challenges, or ‘typical’ teenage behaviour.

Research from King’s College London (2025) on 735 adolescents found:

  • Autistic and ADHD adolescents experienced twice the emotional burden from common school stressors compared to neurotypical peers
  • They reported more intense emotional reactions and higher frequency of distressing events
  • Emotional burden was directly linked to dysregulation, which can drive escalated behaviours at home, including aggression

Although not exclusively neurodivergent statistics, these figures contextualise the scale of CPVA where neurodivergence is frequently cited by families as a factor:

  • 40% of families affected by CPVA do not report it, according to research by London’s Violence Reduction Unit
  • In police domestic abuse incidents, involving suspects under 18 years of age, 64-67% involved CPVA
  • Youth offending caseloads show a 21-27% prevalence of CPVA

According to the Michael Sieff Foundation (2025) review:

  • 80% of cautioned or sentenced children in youth justice have special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) and/or neurodivergence
  • Neurodivergent children enter custody earlier, are more frequently excluded, and receive longer sentences
  • Professionals report significant challenges managing behaviour linked to communication difficulties, emotional dysregulation, and unmet neurodevelopmental needs

A 2025 Healthwatch Central Bedfordshire focus group found:

  • Amongst parents experiencing CPVA, over half were caring for neurodivergent children (autism/ADHD)
  • Families described patterns of meltdowns, shutdowns, and distress behaviours escalating into violence

Neurodiversity Support UK reports that conditions such as ADHD, autism and pathological demand avoidance (PDA) frequently involve:

  • Rapid emotional escalation
  • Intense reactions
  • Loss of behavioural control when overwhelmed

Employers who design predictable flexibility, rather than ad hoc exceptions are better placed to retain skilled staff and prevent their burnout. Employers who understand the connection between neurodivergent conditions and CPVA make life much more manageable for those parents trying to navigate difficulties.

We have put together an A-Z guide which details elements of CPVA, alongside some practical support tips for parents and for operational staff who may happen across incidents involving members of the public.

More information on CPVA and links to external support services can be found on the following websites:

This blog was originally published on the Northamptonshire Police intranet – it is reproduced here with kind permission of the author

Guest Blog: My experience of acquired brain injury

PhD student and former police officer Alexander Wood shares his personal experience of acquired brain injury (ABI), a form of neurodiversity that is often lesser considered but has wide-reaching impacts on individuals and society

On the 4th December 2025, there was a debate in Parliament on a comprehensive action plan on acquired brain injury, which highlighted the importance of recognition of the condition. This underlined for me the urgent need for awareness and understanding of ABI.

According to the report, around 350,000 people a year are admitted to hospital in the UK with an ABI.

ABI is heavily over-represented in the criminal justice system, with around six in 10 prisoners reporting a history of brain injury, and associated justice costs estimated at £1.5 billion annually.

ABI is often misunderstood because its effects can be subtle and not always immediately visible. Depending on the severity and location of the injury, the consequences can be essentially invisible to others. An affected individual may appear to function normally at work or in daily life, while still experiencing significant cognitive, emotional, or physical challenges that are not outwardly obvious. Like anyone else, people change as they grow through life, but following a brain injury, these changes are not always well understood.

Alexander Wood receiving his Chief Superintendent’s Commendation

I personally suffered a brain injury in 2017 during my former police career. At the time, there were never any questions asked about my brain injury because the police organisation relies on medical professionals to ensure support is provided. However, I was quickly discharged without any follow-up support. At the time, I never gave much thought to the wider-reaching consequences, and even now I will probably never fully understand the impact it has had on my life. My experience highlighted to me how, when it comes to neurodiversity, the way policing operates internally often mirrors how it delivers externally, shaping how neurodivergent individuals are understood, engaged with, and treated.

I still recall the incident as if it happened seconds ago. The moment my head struck the floor is burned into my memory: the impact, the shock, the disorienting rush of pain. The fracture in my skull has left me with lingering sensitivity – a constant reminder of how close I came to something far worse. I know it could have been worse, and I know I have been fortunate. The aftermath of my injury can be seen here (warning – graphic image).

Being a police officer working in a response environment, it is easy to believe that you are bulletproof. I ignored the signals my body and mind were sending me, pushing through fatigue and stress without pause, never fully accepting my limitations. In that moment, I learned that resilience isn’t just about pushing harder; it’s about listening to yourself, respecting your limits, and taking care of yourself.

I’m proud to have received two Chief Superintendent’s Commendations, and to have completed a Master’s degree part-time over two years while working full-time as a response officer. Having left the police service in 2023, I am now studying for a fully funded PhD at the University of Worcester, for which I have partnered with the NPAA to conduct an investigation into the levels of support offered for neurodivergent police officers across England and Wales. I am very aware that brain injuries can have detrimental impacts, and I feel extremely thankful to have achieved all of this post-injury.

Recovery from brain injury is a journey, and it starts with self-acceptance: learning your true self, understanding your limitations, and embracing your strengths. Every day, I am reminded of the fragility of life and the strength found in acknowledging our vulnerabilities. I hope that sharing this story encourages others in high-pressure roles to recognise their own limits, prioritise self-care, and understand that true strength includes knowing when to step back. ∎