Coronavirus: new requirement for face coverings in shops

From the 24th July 2020 it will be mandatory by law to wear a face covering in shops, supermarkets, transport hubs and other enclosed public spaces in England, as part of the effort to curb the spread of coronavirus. Face coverings have been required to be worn on public transport in England since the 15th June. (Different rules apply in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.)

Exemptions apply for disabilities or conditions such as autism where wearing a face covering would cause distress. To assist with explaining the need for an exemption, information cards suitable for displaying on a phone or printing are available on the GOV.UK website (click on the link to access PDF downloads).

Note that it is not a requirement in law to carry an information card or medical evidence supporting an exemption – the Government website advises:

Some people may feel more comfortable showing something that says they do not have to wear a face covering. This could be in the form of an exemption card, badge or even a home-made sign.
This is a personal choice and is not necessary in law.
Those who have an age, health or disability reason for not wearing a face covering should not be routinely asked to give any written evidence of this. Written evidence includes exemption cards.

Further resources and advice are available from the National Autistic Society.

The Neurodiversity Question

by Adam O’Loughlin
Head of Policy & Service Delivery | National Police Autism Association

What is ‘neurodiversity’? Many of you will have heard the term either at work or in your personal lives. In fact I’m sure there’s many of you who consider yourselves to be ‘neurodiverse’ or ‘neurodivergent’. I certainly do. But knowing the terms and hearing the words doesn’t really do a lot to help people understand what they mean, and why there there’s a bit of controversy around them.

Neurodiversity is an umbrella term that was coined in the late 90’s by Australian author Judy Singer. Rather than an actual condition, neurodiversity is a respectful way of thinking about those who may have one of a number of neurological or cognitive differences. Usually (and this list is by no means exhaustive) the conditions that fall under the neurodiversity umbrella are:

The trouble is that these conditions mean different things to different people. So, for example: autism is both a neurodiverse condition, a disability and a social/communication impairment; ADHD is a Specific Learning Difference (SpLD), a neurodiverse condition and a cognitive impairment; and dyspraxia is a SpLD, a neurodiverse condition, a disability and a motor coordination disorder – all at the same time.

It’s no wonder people get confused.

Neurodiversity challenges the default assumption that those conditions or disorders need to be eradicated, prevented, treated or cured. In highly social and unpredictable environments, some cognitive differences may come across as disabilities, while in more neurodiverse-friendly environments they can be catered for, allowing people’s talents to blossom. Neurodiversity reminds us that disability and even disorder may be about the person-environment fit.

Where it gets controversial is that some people think that advocates of neurodiversity can trample all over the rights, entitlements and feelings of genuinely disabled people who feel as if their experiences are being minimised away. I have a lot of sympathy for this view and I know many parents in particular who if they were offered a ‘cure’ for their child, would take it.

But I don’t think that the neurodiversity/disability viewpoints are mutually exclusive. Neurodiversity is a fact of nature: our brains are all different, so there is no point in being a neurodiversity denier. It’s my passionate view that our friends and colleagues want to be valued for their differences. What’s attractive about the neurodiversity model is that it doesn’t focus solely on what someone struggles with; instead it gives equal attention to what the person can do without ignoring or minimising their needs.

These biological variations are a vital part of people’s identity, and we should give them equal respect alongside any other form of diversity, such as gender. But to encompass the breadth of those conditions, neurodiversity advocates need to make space for those who do consider themselves disabled – and as pertinently, those with relatives who may be more profoundly affected. ∎

This blog was originally published on the Avon & Somerset Police intranet

PRESS RELEASE: TikTok ‘Autism Challenge’

Bristol, UK: The National Police Autism Association (NPAA) are today aware of a trend on social media site TikTok called the #AutismChallenge – reported as “the worst thing on social media”.

What seems to have begun as a well-intentioned campaign to raise awareness and acceptance of autism has escalated, which has resulted in the abuse of autistic and disabled individuals. This is hate crime, and it is not acceptable.

We advise any autistic person experiencing such abuse to report it to their local police service. Objectionable content on social media should be reported via the platform’s reporting facility.

The NPAA works with all UK police forces to help support autistic victims of crime, as well as continuing to support those within the law enforcement community whose lives are touched by it.

About us: The NPAA is an independent group supporting – and run by – UK police officers, staff and volunteers who are affected by autism (including Asperger syndrome) and other hidden conditions such as dyslexia, dyspraxia and ADHD. We welcome all police personnel with a personal, family or professional interest in these conditions.